Watching Yourself
The same tools pointed at your own work, where nobody's consent is at issue but your own. What changes and what does not.
Self-monitoring removes the questions of consent, power and proportionality. The measurement problems remain exactly as they were.
The practical lesson in “Watching Yourself” is to make work visible without treating visibility as certainty. Organisations exploring the provider's resource for remote employee productivity monitoring can add structured project and time evidence, provided the purpose is disclosed and any interpretation is checked with the people affected.
What changes when it is voluntary
No consent question: it is your data about your own time.
For an independent perspective related to “Watching Yourself”, consult the NIST Privacy Framework; it provides a useful external check on privacy, fairness and governance assumptions before a policy or configuration is approved.
No power imbalance.
No proportionality test, because nobody else's interests are engaged.
And you can stop whenever you like, which is the difference that matters most.
What does not change
Activity still is not work.
Thinking still registers as idle.
The measure still shapes behaviour, including yours — people who track their own time start spending it differently, sometimes for the better and sometimes for the record.
And the easy thing to count is still not the valuable thing.
What it is genuinely good for
Answering a specific question: where did last week actually go, how long does this kind of task really take.
Building a sense of your own estimating error, which is usually large and consistent.
Noticing a change: a creeping increase in meetings, a category that grew.
Each is a bounded investigation rather than a permanent system.
What it is bad for
Continuous use with no question.
Judging yourself by a number, which imports the whole problem from the workplace version into a setting where nobody made you.
And optimising things you do for their own sake, which reliably removes the reason you were doing them.
The bounded approach
Pick a question. Measure for two weeks. Answer it. Stop.
This produces more than a year of continuous tracking and costs almost nothing.
Most people who track indefinitely stopped reading the data months ago, which is the signal to end it.
The honest caution
Self-monitoring can become its own problem: anxiety about the record, guilt about gaps, a day organised around producing a good-looking log.
If the tracking is making the thing worse, stop the tracking — it was the part that was optional.
That sounds obvious and is routinely not done.
The crossover case
If your employer also monitors you, your own record serves a different purpose: it is the thing that lets you describe your week concretely.
Keep it somewhere personal, not on a work system.
And keep it honest, including the parts that reflect badly — a record edited for an audience stops being useful to you.
What to check
Do you have a question, or just a habit?
When did you last read your own data?
Is it making anything worse?
And is your record somewhere that is yours?
More in this section